The dark forces behind power

The dark forces behind power.

“Force without spiritual foundations is doomed to failure.” – Adolf Hitler*

I think it can be logically contended that in terms of world history, Adolf Hitler was one of the most significant leaders in terms of the impact he had at the time, and indeed still has today.  People’s reactions are somewhat passionate, even at the mere utterance of his name, there is always something to say about him.

He managed to carry out the most apocalyptic genocide of the 20th century.  Reflecting on his demonically racist nationalist policies sends most people into a state of unease.  However, once we manage to get past this initial discomfort, we can see that he is a man who clearly wielded a great deal of power and, in his eyes and the eyes of many others, managed to successfully attain his goal of developing and sustaining a so-called supreme race.   What we should be asking ourselves is how he managed to do it.  How did he manage to convince people that his policies were right when anyone with an ounce of humanity could see there was clearly something morally wrong with what he aspired to carry out.  One side of the story we don’t often address in public is the fact that he had a really solid plan.  In terms of policy implementation that is, he was pretty smart to pull off such a feat.  Either that or he had some smart people behind and around him, but from what I’ve read it seems he had quite a hands-on role in his time as Nazi leader.  I have to add here that I in no way condone his policies but am looking at them purely from the point of objective analysis.  I assume those of you that are taking the time to read this, and who have read my other posts understand my stance.  It has to be said though that I’m astonished at his overwhelming ability to coerce an entire nation and beyond into believing that there was a mythical race that existed that was superior to others.  I say mythical because if you do your research on the Aryan race you will see that scholars of Indo-Aryan history have generally rejected the idea of the existence of the race, in the context that it was used for racist ideologies such as his**.

So interesting it is then that he made this quote.   Not only does it sound quite similar to the quote made by Helen Blavatsky (renowned occultist) below, it also indicates the use of occult power within the political realm.  For me this is really an important concept to grasp.  This concept is one that seems to widen the chasm between the group of so-called ‘conspiracy theorists’ and the geo-political analysts. These two groups can often agree on the basics of the new world order theory and the desire of a one world government and united world order and all the trappings that go with it.  Beyond this point their thoughts divide. The geo-politics thinkers stick with this notion of it all being about power politics, and the conspiracy theorists (I have to find a better term for them – suggestions welcome!) keep questioning and examining the wider view.  A lot of this questioning involves spirituality in one form or another, whether it be organized religion, spiritual practices or the occult.  Throughout history man’s search for power and control using higher powers has been relentless.   The individual’s lifelong search for control of their daily lives through religion and spirituality is also carried into group and team spiritual practice.  Religious worship of all denominations itself, is deemed most effective in groups to create a more powerful, usually positive, and hence effective energy.  If this is the case, and both the individual and groups are both units of society, as is the government, or any other organized group such as corporations, then why does it seem so far-fetched to imagine a group of men carrying out worship or occult rituals in the boardroom, or in parliament?  Apart from the kind of energy they wish to create, positive versus negative, is there really any difference between these men and groups of men carrying out rituals or ceremonies in their homes or a place of worship?  Why is it a phenomenon that is often quickly dismissed as fantastical? Labelled an idea that people repudiate so readily, when it’s clearly not so far removed from the everyday reality of spiritual practices.

Going back to Hitler as a primary example. This man carried out one of the most successful commands of a nation and massacres of a race in modern history using occult practices, of which he made no secret, and for which there is a lot of documented evidence, some of which I will link below should you wish to investigate further.  As has been seen before in political history, policies and practices are tried and tested.  Consequently, successful ones are used again and again and again. It should follow then that the great powers or world leaders that follow and preceded Hitler would at least lead by example, and attempt to use a similar strategy to make sure their plans are carried out with the utmost accuracy and efficacy.

Pioneer esoteric, famed occultist, and “mother” of the New Age, Helen Blavatsky said the following:

“…if purely material implements are capable of blowing up, from a few corners, the great cities of the globe, providing the murderous weapons are guided by expert hands – what terrible dangers might not arise from magical occult secrets being revealed, and allowed to fall into the possession of ill-meaning people! A thousand times more dangerous and lethal are these, because neither the criminal hand, nor the immaterial invisible weapon used, can ever be detected.” (Studies in Occultism, pp.28-29).


The above was originally published in Lucifer magazine*** 1891, and was re-published in a collection of Blavatsky’s writings titled Studies in Occultism.

Christopher Hale released ‘Himmler’s Crusade: The Nazi Expedition to Find the Origins of the Aryan Race’, in 2006 after extensive research and interviews with central people such as the anthropologist Dr Bruno Beger who was hired by the Nazi party/SS to assist them on their quest to Tibet to find the true ancestry of Tibetans and hence that of the Aryan race.  Hale goes on to explain Helen Blavatsky’s involvement with the Nazi party.

“At the societal level, occultism can add upon an underlying destructive worldview or become the foundation for a culture of terror. The German Nazi movement blended myth and occultism, pseudoscience and technology. And it’s no surprise to learn that it’s pan-pagan roots were firmly planted in the soil of Blavatsky’s teachings.” (Christopher Hale)  Again in his book ‘Himmler’s Crusades’^, he sums it up; Myth is never harmless.”

Appealing once again to the logic of those who know that there are many morally questionable practices that people of power are involved with, as discussed in my last post.  If someone as powerful and influential as Hitler is telling us that ‘spiritual’ practices are used, and without them force is doomed to failure, perhaps we should get ourselves past the evil of his actions, listen carefully to what he said, and think about it.

* Quote taken from – Nazi’s: The Occult Conspiracy (full movie)



^Himmler’s Crusade: The Nazi Expedition to Find the Origins of the Aryan Race, Castle Books, 2006.

Related links

Helen Blavatsky

Gary Lachman’s book – Politics and the Occult: The Left, the Right, and the Radically Unseen

Invisible Empire


The Powers that be..

The last post about defining power came about while thinking about what drives the world’s elites, governments and authorities. We always claim money and power, and that the two are synonymous with each other.  There are too many maxims and proverbs to quote about the correlation between money/power and what is ‘evil’.

A few months back I attended a discussion by Dr Phil Zimbardo (Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Stanford University) in Dubai. Dr Zimbardo has received worldwide acclaim for his many groundbreaking if not somewhat controversial psychological experiments and theories.  He was a key witness and analyst of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. One of his theories is called ‘The Lucifer effect*’ in which he offers a psychological account of how seemingly ordinary or ’good’ people turn evil.  In 1971 he carried out a now notorious experiment called the Stanford Prison experiment**.  He put an ad in the local newspaper encouraging students to volunteer and participate.  After extensive tests and psychological analyses of each student, he then assigned some of the students to play the role of prison guards and the others the role of prisoners in a simulated prison.   In brief, his 2-week experiment was shut down after only 6 days due to the cruelty with which the ‘guards’ started to treat the ‘prisoners’.

Zimbardo’s experiment concluded that there were 3 types of guard.  One type that followed the rules of the prison, that was tough but fair.  The second type were the “good guys” who helped the prisoners and never punished them, and the third type who were hostile and unpredictable and ‘inventive in their forms of prisoner humiliation. These guards appeared to thoroughly enjoy the power they wielded, yet none of our preliminary personality tests were able to predict this behavior.’

In an interview that followed the closure of the experiment, this third group of guards expressed their disappointment that the experiment was stopped prematurely.

So what exactly is it that drives apparently nice, good or intelligent people to be driven to such malicious behaviour.  Dr Zimbardo has a few ideas, and in a view that opposes Realist theory, is essentially an optimist or a rationalist.  His belief is that people are intrinsically good but are affected by different types of evil.  He categorizes these types of evil as dispositional (of character/personality), situational (such as in the prison experiment) and systemic (political, economic or cultural influences).

His idea that humans are inherently good opposes classical realist theory that states that people are selfish by nature and driven to compete with others for domination and self-advantage.  This has been shown in countless events in history and is ever-present in current-day global politics. Realists often question letting ethics or morals get in the way of their decision or foreign-policy making to a point where they often disregard moral norms.

Foreign policy is not social work.’ (Krauthammer, 1993)

This can clearly be illustrated in the countless violations of numerous pacts and treaties throughout history such as the Kellogg-Briand Pact which was violated by the commencement of World War II, and Article 2 (4) (7) of the UN Charter which outlawed humanitarian intervention until 1990 because it undermines the sovereignty of the state, which is the basis of humanitarian law, which is again being violated as we speak in Libya.

“I am not interested in power for power’s sake, but I’m interested in power that is moral, that is right and that is good.”

Martin Luther King, Jr.


But if the concept of power itself is evil and it’s in human nature to be selfish, especially once we have power to wield, then can there be such a thing as a power that is moral and good?

Realists such as Machiavelli argued that the principles of morals, ethics and piety were positively harmful if adhered to by state leaders.  It was considered imperative that state leaders learned a different kind of morality, which accorded not to traditional Christian virtues but to political necessity and prudence. (Tim Dunne/Brian C . Schmidt The Globalization of World Politics)

Which leads me to wonder exactly what is that ‘different kind of morality’ that Machiavelli advises state leaders to adhere to.  As seen in the Stanford Prison experiment, it seems as though the lust for and gain of power can create evil in what might have previously been an essentially good human nature.  Therefore, if absolute power and gain is the essence of global politics, the most powerful ruler in the world and any state, institution or organization that attempts to gain control or domination of the world, must also be essentially evil.

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton, first Baron Acton, 1887


References and quotes:

* Stanford Prison Experiment,

** The Lucifer Effect

Defining ‘Power’

Power is the main concern in political thought, theory and events – contemporary and historical. The balance of power between states is supposed to be essential, however we can clearly see an imbalance or even extreme polarity in the custodian(s) of power on the world political stage.

*power |ˈpou(-ə)r| (n.)

  1. the ability to do something.
  2. the ability to influence people or events.
  3. the right or authority to do something.
  4. Political authority or control.
  5. A country seen as having international influence and military strength.

Post-war realist H.J Morgenthau aptly describes power as;

“Man’s control over the minds and actions of other men.” (1948)

He goes on to say;

“Power is a relational concept, one does not exercise power in a vacuum but in relation to another entity.”

Other relevant power quotes;

“Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” Abraham Lincoln

“Power is my mistress.  I have worked too hard at her conquest to allow anyone to take her away from me.”  Napoleon Bonaparte

“The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don’t have any.”  Alice Walker, author.

Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat.John Lehman, Secretary of the US Navy, 1981-1987


“The problem of power is how to achieve its responsible use rather than its irresponsible and indulgent use – of how to get men of power to live for the public rather than off the public.

Robert F. Kennedy (1964)


Power never takes a back step – only in the face of more power.

Malcolm X (1965)

Power consists in one’s capacity to link his will with the purpose of others, to lead by reason and a gift of cooperation.

Woodrow Wilson (1913)


You see what power is – holding someone else’s fear in your hand and showing it to them!Amy Tan, writer.


*definition taken from the Oxford conscise dictionary

Osama is dead; timing is of the essence.

..well only when the TIME is right!

..and only when the time is right!

I just heard the news that Osama bin Laden is dead.  It reminded me of the time they told us they’d found Saddam in a hole somewhere in the desert.  It just didn’t ring true.  In fact, it sounded just like the key plot or ending of a US blockbuster movie or hit TV series of the type I can’t abide.  Without even looking at all the details I viewed the facts and realised that another key stage in geopolitical events is unfolding right in front of us.

When looking at the many theories of global politics, timing is everything.  We can see this has been applied in every major world war or revolution since the beginning of time.  If you ask any historian about false flags they will give you a rundown on key events that were orchestrated to trigger events or an event for the benefit of a certain state at a certain time in history.

Firstly if we look at the civil revolution currently happening in the Middle East that will eventually lead to calls for democracy based on the “success” of the model of the West (I quote success because this is what we are conditioned to believe about this system) we can see a strategic implementation of policies of the UN going on under the guise of liberation and humanitarian aid.  We should really be asking ourselves what is their end goal.  Reports say in Al Jazeera* say Osama was being kept hidden by Pakistani intelligence.  Evidently should there be any further conflict in the region, geographically, politically and historically speaking Pakistan would be an ideal place from which to also be present.

Secondly, just as thinking people start to question and debate what exactly are the intentions of the US, UK, France and the UN in intervening in Libya, we are given a reminder of 9/11.  9/11 has been highly reported and researched by renowned historians, economists and scientists alike, and has been found conclusively to be the biggest false flag attack of the 21st Century to date.  Many including myself believe that Osama bin Laden is/was a creation of the CIA or other/combined intelligence agencies ruled by government who are in turn ruled by corporations and elitist groups such as the UN, CFR, Bilderberg and so on.  Osama was essentially created as the face that represents the ‘other’ or the enemy.  As such, in claiming he has been killed by the US, as with Saddam Hussein, acts as a clear signal to show the world that they are indeed making all this mess in the region for a valid reason.  To quote Mr. Obama himself:

The death of Osama Bin Laden is the most significant achievement against Al Qaeda. ” 

Mr George W. Bush who was of course in power at the start of the US’s ‘War on Terror’ said eloquently:

“His death is a monumental achievement. The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done.”

Spielberg couldn’t have scripted it better if he was writing the new hit Armageddon-style movie for 2012.

Thirdly, and again looking at the current climate, another important event taking place is the campaign for US presidential elections in 2012.  As I mentioned above a lot of political theories, strategies and events deal with time and the system of numbers.  Time, or timing and the use of it is as expensive a commodity as money and the subsequent power that oozes out of it.  Therefore, making Obama look like the cowboy hero, just as Bush did back in 2003**, is an essential move in the strategic rebranding of Obama for re-election.  The public will now have renewed faith in their President as he has saved them from their archenemy. They can understand and forgive the atrocities caused by Bush et al because it has all been for a reason.  And finally, the powers that be have the ultimate result; blind faith and trust of the public once more. So of course the public will now go to the ballot and re-elect, not that their votes count as such, but part of the said strategy is to be sure that people think that their votes count.  Following this the people will continue to indiscriminately love the democratic system that keeps them so free, and in such a position of what they consider to be political advantage compared to other countries that have been unsuccessful in adopting their democratic system.

*The report in Al Jazeera online today

**Bush’s drones found Saddam “in a rat hole” even the metaphor itself seemed glaringly obvious.

The Real New World Order : intifada?

As I await Mubarak’s address to his nation and what looks like the end of the protests in Tahrir square, I think back at the effects of the last 2 weeks. My emotional reaction to the Egyptian revolution over the last few weeks was one I felt I had to comment on.  Not my reaction itself, as I was sure to be stirred up by it but the intensity of empathy and excitement I felt for the Egyptian people.

On watching the news coverage last weekend I found myself welling up with tears of hope and sadness.  Sadness because I had seen images of the past week that saddened me considerably.  Images of people dying are of course never easy to deal with on any level be it emotional, spiritual or political.  Others are seriously injured, or prepared to take the risk of being.  They’re in it, until the end, which in the latest news updates today looks like it might be soon.  Such a display of resilience and communal effort reignited my already feverish determination to play an active role in our world.   I watch these courageous people and hope that the rest of the world, particularly the West, can see this display of courage and unity, and then reflect for a moment about what this is able to achieve.    People can make a difference, contrary to the opinion of the masses that for the most part believe that people have no power, that we are helpless.  Well, right now there are people who are, contrary to our usual defeatist idea, sacrificing their lives for their belief.  Their belief that they can make a change and have the right to a decent standard of living for themselves their children, their grandchildren and hopefully that the change they make can be implemented and last until their great-grandchildren’s generation.

My feeling of hope and excitement as I watched the footage only marginally echoed theirs.  It signals a new era of hope for them and the rest of the world.  Hope that this act of revolt and reclamation was the start of a new world order.  Not the 2012 doomsday version that everyone has been rattling on about, but an era of change and positivity that would benefit the people.  It looks like we can turn it around.  The start of a real democracy, driven by people.  After all, the origin of the word does mean exactly that; ‘demos – the people’ kratia ‘power, rule’.  We have a say in our own world and how we live.  Not the subtly prescribed democracy that the US has been trying to shove down other countries throats.  Their democracy reeks of a new form of Imperialism.  A new empire ruled not by force but by “election”.    Which gives us great freedom you know.  We are so free.  To choose whom we want to choose for President or Prime Minister.   We are free to choose to have our freedom taken away from us.  And choose we do!  Democracy that reveals itself to oppose what it actually stands for.  The people of the West are starting to look at the policies of the East and see that we no as far apart as we have been made to believe.  Even more so with the skin that covers our so-called freedoms rapidly shedding away from the policies they envelope.

Hello world!

I hope to be able to use this blog to vent my many ponderings.